Sunday, April 28, 2013

Adam Scott's win at the Augusta Masters 2013





                Adam Scott’s brilliant victory at the Augusta Master’s this year has been brilliantly captured in the photograph above. His hands raised in trumph and closed eyes convey the unsaid emotion of Adam’s emphatic victory at the Masters.
                The photograph brilliantly captures Adam Scott as the central subject who is savouring his historic trumph at the second playoff hole after being tied at the end of the 18th hole with Angel Caberera. Hs caddle Stevie Williams is shown in the background with his right hand raised high and mouth wide open in celebration. His face is slightly out of focus to ensure that the atention remains with the star of the day. You can imagine the large crowds in the back ground which are not in the france applauding Adam’s victory. The victory was doubly sweet for the golfer as he had sufferred a tragic defeat to Ernie Els in the British open after leading till the 17th hole.
                Most sportsmen would have been shattered by the defeat but Adam came out stonger from the defeat to not only  even his Major but break the Australian Jinix at the Augusta Masters.What does Adam’s victory tell us about expertise ?  Even after losing the British open Adam did not give up or get frustrated by the loss and used it as a stepping stone to greater glory. This is quite similiar to what Coyle wrote in his chapter “ The sweet spot”1. As Coyle brings out in his text that an individual learns from his mistakes and uses these failures to perfect his art and reach the zenith in his field. This resonates in Adam Scott’s context where he uses the British open failure as a lesson to improve his craft. The aspect of deep practice as used in Coyle’s text or deliberate prctive as described  in the article “What it takes to be Great2 applies to each golfer or sportsman who improves his game by learning and practiving all facets of his chosen sport till he excels in his chosed field.
                Adam Scott had been a Masters hopeful for quite a few years and through his continued perseverance and effort was able to reach the pinnacle of his sporting career. His failure at the British Open was certainly the catalyst for his truimph at the Augusta Masters. This would not have been possible for the self effacing Aussie had he let fame get to his head. Instead he persevered at every stage and finally achieved the  success he was looking for. The photograph truly conveys this feeling with the golfer as the central subject framed perfectly in the centre and his closed eyes and open arms signifying the fullfillment of life long dream.

References
1.    Coyle, D. (2009). The Talent code. New York: Random House Publishing Group (Extract from Chapter 1: The Sweet Spot (Pg 11 - 28) )
2.    Colvin, Geoffrey. “What It Takes to be Great.” Fortune 19 October 2006

Friday, April 19, 2013

Critical Review - Daniel Coyle’s “The Sweet Spot”


The Role of Practice - Moving from Potential to Greatness
A Critical Review of Daniel Coyle’s “The Sweet Spot”

         In the “The Sweet Spot”, the first chapter of the book “The Talent Code” by Daniel Coyle, the writer searches for the secret behind great talent. He discovers and presents the idea of “deep practice” (p26) and how it nurtures and produces great talent.
       Coyle argues that one can become an expert in his field by indulging in “deep practice”. He explains it as a dedicated effort in a person’s chosen field where he pushes himself to an edge where failure is very likely. These failures are the catalyst for a person to accelerate his learning curve, enhance his skills and eventually excel in his chosen field.  The main evidence which author draws upon is his research in the nine nurseries of talent (or hotbeds as Coyle calls them) which he visited to look for answers. Coyle found that besides the great potential and talent that existed in these places there was also the desire and inclination of individuals to push themselves beyond their limits and use failure as stepping stones to ultimate success. At the tennis academy in Moscow, soccer field in Sao Paolo, Brazil and a music academy in New York, the writer saw how the students pushed themselves to try a difficult move and find “the sweet spot” (p19), the point where there learning would accelerate. As Robert Bjork, the chair of psychology at UCLA quotes in the text, “There’s an optimal gap between what you know and what you’re trying to do. When you find that sweet spot, learning takes off.” (p19)
          Coyle supports his idea by describing Brunio (p 11) an eleven year old boy perfecting the “elastico” move by repeatedly trying and failing and finally succeeding. He then talks about Jennie, a twenty four year old musician (p 11) who sings a song again and again while going for the “big finish” i.e the perfect way to do it. From Bruno and Jennie‘s examples he questions whether repeated failure is a way improving the skill of these people. The reader is then drawn into fascinating world of Brazilian soccer where he traces its growth and looks for factors responsible for their success. The author claims that the real change in their history occurred when the Brazilians changed the way they trained.
Coyle’s visual exercise of asking the reader to go through two lists of words, one correct and another one with few letters missing is a nice example of different way our minds react and learn. When one is forced to break one’s thought, the memory of that word lingers. This he argues is akin to “deep practice” wherein you focused more on the list with broken words. He supports this by quoting Bjork(p18) who says “One real encounter …. is far  more useful than several hundred observations”.   Edwin Link’s (p 20) story of how he built an aircraft trainer for aircraft pilots to practice their skills on ground and reduce aircraft crashes further aids Coyle’s claim. His final story which appears most convincing is that of soccer coach Sam Clifford (p 24) who learnt the Brazilian mini soccer game “Futsal” and introduced it in United Kingdom. He focused on ball handling skills at the junior level and successfully reared an entire crop of talented players who learnt soccer by deep practice using the “futsal” method.
             To support his claim Coyle effectively uses questions and key phrases at various stages to gain the users attention. He call the nine centers’ “the chicken wire Harvards”(p11) which generate “Everest size amounts of talent” signifying that they were modeled in a crude way on a world class institution and produce highly talented individuals . These phrases help attract attention and generate user’s interest in the text. He calls his research a “Treasure Hunt” (p12) and compares it to Darwin's voyage to pique the user’s interest in outcome of his expedition. His examples are exotic ranging from “elastico” move in Brazil to visual examples which involve the reader is an activity to reinforce his point of view. His description of Edward Link’s dramatic entry in a plane during a thunderstorm dramatizes the story and reinforces the area of Links Aviation Trainer as a tool of deep practice for acquiring a talent.
           I personally find Coyle’s chapter to be very interesting reading. I found his style of writing very conversational and his examples very inspirational. His ability to draw from various field and diverse geographical regions as well as over varying age groups lends credence to his claim.  Coyle’s claim of “deep practice” being an effective way of gaining expertise in a particular field is well supported by various examples.
           However there are certain grey areas in his claim. There is no justification as to how he selected the nine centers and which ones he rejected. There is also surprisingly no contrarian view and no effort to discuss factors which may go against his claim. For example how would Coyle counter the predominance of African American athletes in world of athletics and basketball where their physical abilities make them surpass other athletes? Their physical characteristics will work over less endowed athletes in the same field.  Another limitation is that is that he has used lot of examples and no evidence. A statistical analysis, sourced from a large pool of athletes, may have made the claim sounder and more believable. Another flaw in his writing is the reference to Clarissa video (12, 14, 15, and 28) which first time readers cannot relate to.
           Coyle presents a very convincing argument which is presented with well written prose, pertinent questions and stimulating stories. What he lacks is a sound academic rigour to support his claims. This could be supplemented by previous research in this field and numeric data in favour of his argument. Though the text lacks the rigour of an academic paper for his claim, I feel that any data or graphs would have made the text insipid and boring to read. In the chapter Coyle leads his readers to an expedition in search of secret code to talent which they feel they would discover when they read his book.

References
Coyle, D. (2009). The Talent code. New York: Random House Publishing Group (Extract from Chapter 1: The Sweet Spot (Pg 11 - 28) )

Monday, April 1, 2013

First Draft of Critical Review - Daniel Coyle’s “The Sweet Spot”


Critical Review of Daniel Coyle’s “The Sweet Spot”

              “The Sweet Spot” is the first chapter of the book “The Talent Code” by Daniel Coyle. In this chapter Daniel Coyle presents the idea of deep practice which he feels helps nurture and produce great talent.      
       The author’s main claim is that a person can become an expert in his field by indulging in a “deep practice”. This term ‘deep practice’ according to him means a dedicated effort by a person in his chosen field where he pushes himself to an edge where failure is very likely. Further, these efforts, which most likely will result in failure, will be the catalyst for a person to improve his skills and eventually excel in his chosen field.        
       The main evidence which author draws upon are examples from nine coaching centres or hotbeds as Coyle likes to call them. During his research the author visited each of these nurseries of talent and found that besides the great potential and talent that existed in these places there was also the desire and inclination of  individuals to push themselves beyond their limits and use failure a stepping stones to ultimate success. The author visited various places such as a tennis academy in Moscow, soccer field in Sao Paolo, Brazil, a music academy in New York and uses specific examples from these places to build his argument.                     
           Coyle’s claim of deep practice being an effective way of gaining expertise in a particular field is well supported by various examples. His ability to draw from various field and diverse geographical regions as well as over varying age groups lends credence to his claim. However there are certain grey areas in his claim. There is no justification as to how he selected the nine centers and which ones he rejected. There is also surprisingly no contrarian view and no effort to discuss factors which may go against his claim. For example how would Coyle counter the predominance of African American athletes in world of athletics where their physical abilities make them surpass other athletes. Another limitation of his claim is that is that he has used specific examples and no statistics. A statistical analysis, sourced from a large pool of athletes, may have made the claim sounder and more believable.
          The main examples he uses to justify his claim are those of how Brunio (p 11) an eleven year old boy perfects the “elastico” move by repeatedly trying and failing and finally succeeding. He supplements this  by quoting the example of Jennie, a twenty four year old musician (p 11) who is trying to sing a pop song which she perfects after repeated attempts. He questions whether repeated failure is a way improving the skill of these people. Subsequently, he goes to a bigger example of Brazilian soccer where he traces the growth of Brazilian soccer and what factors were responsible for their success. He argues that the two factors of gene and environment were always existing, however the change occurred in 1950’s when the Brazilians changed the way they trained. Further he uses a visual example of asking the reader to go through two lists of words, one correct and another one with few letters missing. When one is forced to break one’s thought the memory of that word lingers. This he argues is akin to deep practice wherein you focused more on the list with broken words. He also quotes Robert Bjork, the chair of psychology at UCLA who says “One real encounter …. is far  more useful than several hundred observations”.  He claims that deep practice goes against talent as dedicated and focused effort may beat natural talent. Further he claims that talent can be acquired by deep practice. The author also quotes example of how Edwin Link (p 20)  who built an aircraft trainer for aircraft pilots to practice their skills on ground and reduce aircraft crashes. His final story which appears most convincing is that of soccer coach Sam Clifford (p 24) who learnt the Brazilian mini soccer game “Futsal” and introduced it in United Kingdom. He focused on ball handling skills at the junior level and successfully reared a entire crop of talented players who learnt soccer by deep practice using the “futsal”  method.
             To support his claim Coyle effectively uses questions and key phrases at various stages to gain the users attention. He call the nine centres “the chicken wire Harvards” which generate “Everest size amounts of talent” signifying that they were modeled in a crude way on a world class institution and produce highly talented individuals . These phrases help attract attention and generate users interest in the text. He calls his research a “Treasure Hunt” to pique the users interest in outcome of his expedition to find the factors of acclaimed success. His examples are exotic ranging from “elastico” move in Brazil to visual examples which involve the reader is an activity to reinforce his point of view. His description of Edward Links dramatic entry in a plane during a thunderstorm dramatizes the story and reinforces the area of Links Aviation Trainer as a tool of deep practice for acquiring a talent.
           I personally find Coyle’s  chapter to be very interesting reading and would love to read his full book. I found his style of writing very conversational is examples very inspirational. Though the text lacks the rigour of a an academic paper for his claim, I feel that data would have made the text insipid and boring to read. I would have liked for the writer to have reduced the length of stories a little and wrote more on how he came about his finding.    
           Coyle presents a very convincing argument which is presented with well written prose and interesting examples. What he lacks is a sound academic rigour to support his claims  This would be supplemented by previous research in this field and numeric data in favour of his argument. However considering the fact that this chapter is a part of novel, Coyle presents his claim in an effective manner which enthuses the reader to continue reading his book and learn more of his theory and how to apply the same to one’s personal life

References
Coyle, D. (2009). The Talent code. New York: Random House Publishing Group (Extract from Chapter 1: The Sweet Spot (Pg 11 - 28) )